The following are the Basic Standards for a safe and effective mentoring or tutoring program. Programs wishing to learn more about best practices may download a copy of the National Mentoring Partnership's Elements of Effective Practice from MENTOR at www.mentoring.org, click on Find Resources and then Elements of Effective Practices.
Determine specific goals/objectives for the mentoring program.
Have the mentor complete and keep on file the following items:
Have the following forms completed regarding the mentee and keep on file:
Conduct a face-to-face meeting between a program representative and the mentor/tutor before matching with the youth.
Conduct a face-to-face meeting between a program representative and the youth to be mentored.
Provide a program orientation or overview including program policies and procedures, goals and expectations of mentors/tutors.
Provide for and assure that all mentors/tutors have completed mentor training appropriate for the program.
Provide regular contact between the program representative and each member of the match (mentor and mentee) for the purposes of monitoring progress and addressing issues.
Have in place a plan for mentor/mentee recognition.
Providing recognition for significant contributions and accomplishments is an important component of a healthy, safe and rewarding mentoring environment. It is true, after all, that little things-the pat on the back, the positive mention of one's name-do matter. Both public recognition and private kudos for a job well done boost morale, foster team spirit and raise retention rates across the board: mentees, mentors, volunteers and staff alike.
Conduct regular evaluations appropriate to the objectives of the program.
People in the mentoring field tend to believe implicitly that mentoring benefits young people and that, therefore, expensive evaluations are an unnecessary drain on precious resources. Given the choice between spending money on evaluation or extending their services, many mentoring programs will gladly choose the latter. Although understandable, such choices may be shortsighted. We should not necessarily assume that all mentoring programs are equally beneficial - and we still have a lot to learn about the many newer types of mentoring programs (e.g., site-based, group, peer, e-mail). Convincing evaluations are needed to assess the effectiveness of both traditional one-to-one mentoring programs and newer approaches. Such work will play an important role in the expansion of high-quality mentoring programs.